1033-1109 CE
God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" — and such a being must exist in reality, not merely in understanding, because existence in reality is greater than existence in understanding alone.
Anselm was born in 1033 in Aosta, Alpine town in Kingdom of Burgundy (modern Valle d’Aosta, Italy), strategically located on mountain passes between Italy and France. His father Gundulf was Lombard nobleman of considerable property. His mother Ermenberga was devoutly religious, instilling deep piety in young Anselm.
As child, he was precociously religious, imagining God dwelling on mountaintops, dreaming of visiting God’s palace in clouds. At age fifteen, he desired entering monastery but was refused (possibly too young, possibly father opposed). The rejection devastated him. He turned to worldly pursuits, becoming what he later called “frivolous” — enjoying aristocratic life, rebelling against religious discipline.
His mother died when he was in early twenties. Relations with domineering father deteriorated. Around 1056, age 23, Anselm fled home, crossing Alps into Burgundy and France with single servant, living wandering scholar’s life for three years.
In 1059, age 26, he arrived at Bec Abbey in Normandy, recently founded (1034) Benedictine monastery rapidly gaining reputation for learning under Prior Lanfranc. Lanfranc (c.1005-1089) was brilliant Italian theologian who established Bec’s school. Anselm was immediately impressed by Lanfranc’s intellectual rigor and spiritual depth. In 1060, Anselm entered Bec as novice monk.
Under Lanfranc’s mentorship, Anselm flourished intellectually and spiritually. He studied liberal arts (grammar, rhetoric, logic), theology, Scripture, Church Fathers (especially Augustine). When Lanfranc became abbot of new monastery at Caen (1063), Anselm, only 30, succeeded him as prior of Bec — responsible for monastery’s daily administration and school’s direction.
As prior (1063-1078), Anselm transformed Bec into Europe’s leading intellectual center. Students came from across Europe. His teaching combined logical rigor with devotional warmth. He developed close friendships with students and fellow monks, writing numerous affectionate letters expressing deep spiritual bonds.
During this period, he wrote his first philosophical works. Monologion (1076) presented arguments for God’s existence and nature through dialectical reasoning. Proslogion (1077-78) contained his famous ontological argument for God’s existence — attempting to prove God from concept alone.
In 1078, Abbot Herluin died. Monks unanimously elected Anselm abbot. He reluctantly accepted, continuing intellectual work while managing monastery’s temporal affairs. He proved excellent administrator — fair, gentle, spiritually wise — though he preferred contemplation to management.
In 1093, Archbishop Lanfranc of Canterbury died. English King William II (William Rufus) kept archbishopric vacant, appropriating its revenues. When William fell seriously ill (1093), fearing death, he appointed Anselm archbishop to secure divine favor. Anselm, age 60, strongly resisted appointment. He loved Bec’s peaceful monastic life; Canterbury meant political entanglements. But under enormous pressure from king, English bishops, and Pope, he accepted.
His fears proved justified. William II recovered and immediately clashed with Anselm over investiture controversy — whether kings could appoint bishops and receive their homage before Church consecration. Anselm maintained spiritual authority (Pope) should invest bishops; William claimed temporal authority (king) controlled appointments in his realm. This wasn’t merely power struggle but fundamental question: Is Church independent or subordinate to state?
Anselm refused compromising Church’s independence. He attended Council of Bari (1098) and Council of Rome (1099), where Pope Urban II reaffirmed Church’s position. William refused allowing Anselm’s return to England. Anselm spent 1097-1100 in exile, welcomed by Italian monasteries and Pope.
William II died in hunting accident (1100). New king Henry I recalled Anselm (1100). But investiture controversy reignited. Henry I demanded homage from bishops; Anselm refused. He went into exile again (1103-1107), this time to France. Finally, compromise was reached (1107): king renounced investiture with spiritual symbols (ring and staff) but bishops rendered temporal homage for lands. Anselm returned to Canterbury (1107).
During exiles, he continued writing. Cur Deus Homo (Why God Became Man, 1094-98) explained atonement through satisfaction theory. De Concordia (On the Harmony of Foreknowledge, Predestination, and Grace with Free Will, 1108-09) addressed theological problems of freedom and grace.
He died April 21, 1109, age 76, on Wednesday of Holy Week, at Canterbury Cathedral. He was peacefully praying, surrounded by monks. He was buried in Canterbury Cathedral. Popular devotion developed immediately, but formal canonization came late (1494). He was declared Doctor of the Church (1720).
His legacy: pioneering rational theology, ontological argument still debated, satisfaction atonement theory dominating Western Christianity, model of intellectual monk balancing contemplation and administration, and defender of Church’s independence from state power.
"For I do not seek to understand in order to believe, but I believe in order to understand. For I believe this also, that unless I believe, I shall not understand."
— Proslogion, Chapter 1 — establishing "faith seeking understanding" methodology
"And certainly that than which a greater cannot be thought cannot be in the understanding alone. For if it is even in the understanding alone, it can be thought to exist in reality also, which is greater."
— Proslogion, Chapter 2 — the ontological argument's core reasoning
"Nor do I seek to understand so that I may believe, but I believe so that I may understand."
— Proslogion, Preface — restating faith's priority while defending reason's role
Anselm pioneered rational theology through “faith seeking understanding” — using reason to illuminate revelation without replacing it.
Faith Seeking Understanding: His method: “I do not seek to understand in order to believe, but I believe in order to understand.” Faith precedes reason temporally and epistemologically. You must believe in God (through revelation, grace, Scripture) before you can understand God rationally. Reason then illuminates what faith accepts, making implicit explicit, confused clear, mysterious intelligible. This isn’t fideism (faith alone, reason irrelevant) or rationalism (reason alone, faith irrelevant) but their integration. Faith provides content; reason provides understanding.
The Ontological Argument: Proslogion Chapter 2 presents famous argument: (1) God is “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” (definition accepted by believer and atheist). (2) Even the fool (Psalm 14:1: “The fool says in his heart there is no God”) understands this definition when hearing it. (3) What exists in understanding and reality is greater than what exists in understanding alone. (4) If God existed only in understanding, we could conceive something greater (same being existing in reality). (5) But this contradicts definition (nothing greater can be conceived). (6) Therefore God must exist in reality. Chapter 3 adds: God cannot even be conceived not to exist (necessary existence is greater than contingent existence).
Gaunilo’s Objection: Monk Gaunilo immediately replied “On Behalf of the Fool”: By same logic, we could prove perfect island exists. We can conceive “island than which no greater island can be conceived.” By ontological argument’s reasoning, such island must exist. But obviously it doesn’t. Therefore argument fails.
Anselm’s Response: Distinguishes necessary being (God) from contingent beings (islands, humans, finite things). Ontological argument applies only to necessary being. Islands are contingent — they could be greater (more trees, beaches, etc.) indefinitely. God is necessary being — perfection without limit. Only for necessary being does essence entail existence.
Historical Reception: Medieval philosophers mostly accepted ontological argument (Bonaventure, Duns Scotus). Thomas Aquinas rejected it, arguing we don’t know God’s essence sufficiently to deduce existence. Descartes revived it (Meditation V). Leibniz refined it modally. Kant famously criticized it, arguing “existence is not real predicate” — existence doesn’t add to concept’s content, so you can’t deduce existence from concept. 20th-century analytic philosophers revived it: Hartshorne, Malcolm, Plantinga developed modal versions arguing necessary existence (existence in all possible worlds) follows from possibly existing necessarily.
Satisfaction Theory of Atonement: Cur Deus Homo asks: Why did God become human? Anselm’s answer through dialogue: Sin offends God’s infinite honor. Infinite offense requires infinite satisfaction. Humans owe this debt (they sinned) but can’t pay it (finite beings can’t satisfy infinite debt). Only God can satisfy infinite debt, but humans owe it. Therefore, only God-man (Christ, fully divine and human) can satisfy what humans owe. Christ’s voluntary death (sinless person dying) provides infinite satisfaction. This satisfies justice (debt paid) while demonstrating mercy (God provides payment). God doesn’t arbitrarily forgive (violating justice) or refuse forgiving (lacking mercy) but harmonizes both through Christ’s satisfaction.
This replaced earlier ransom theory (Christ pays ransom to devil, who held humans captive through sin). Anselm’s juridical framework dominated Western Christianity, influencing Protestantism’s penal substitution theory.
Arguments from Degrees: Monologion presents arguments later called “fourth way” (by Aquinas). Goodness, beauty, existence come in degrees. Things are more or less good, beautiful, existent. Degrees require absolute standard for comparison. Therefore, absolute Good, absolute Beauty, absolute Being (God) must exist as standard. This assumes Platonic participation — finite goods participate in absolute Good. Modern critics question whether degrees require absolute standard or just comparative relations.
Freedom and Necessity: De Libertate Arbitrii defines freedom as “ability to preserve rightness of will for its own sake,” not ability to sin. True freedom is choosing good because it’s right, not because it benefits you. God has maximum freedom while unable to sin. Angels originally had freedom with ability to sin; some chose rightly (preserving freedom without sin-ability), others chose wrongly (losing freedom through sin). Humans inherited corrupted freedom needing grace’s restoration. This compatibilist account tries reconciling divine foreknowledge, predestination, and human freedom through distinguishing freedom’s essence (rectitude-preservation) from its corrupted condition (sin-ability).