Anselm of Canterbury

ANSELM OF CANTERBURY

1033-1109 CE

God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" — and such a being must exist in reality, not merely in understanding, because existence in reality is greater than existence in understanding alone.

Difficulty:
Born: 1033 in Aosta, Kingdom of Burgundy (modern-day Italy)
Died: 1109 (aged 76)
Nationality: Italian (later Norman-English)

Personal Character

Brilliant dialectician, reluctant archbishop, monastic philosopher. Born into noble family in Aosta (Alpine town between Italy and France), rebellious youth clashing with domineering mother. After mother's death, fled home at 23, wandering through Burgundy and France. Arrived at Bec Abbey (Normandy, 1060), inspired by prior Lanfranc's intellectual rigor, became monk. Succeeded Lanfranc as prior (1063), then abbot (1078), transforming Bec into Europe's leading intellectual center. Reluctantly appointed Archbishop of Canterbury (1093), succeeding his teacher Lanfranc. Spent much of archbishopric in exile, feuding with English kings (William II, Henry I) over investiture controversy — whether kings could appoint bishops. Defended Church's independence fiercely despite personal cost. As philosopher, pioneered "faith seeking understanding" — using reason to illuminate revelation, not replace it. Developed ontological argument for God's existence, argument from degrees of perfection, satisfaction theory of atonement. Wrote in prayerful, meditative style — philosophy as worship, not mere intellectual exercise. Known for gentleness, pastoral care, and devotional intensity. Died peacefully at Canterbury (1109) on Wednesday of Holy Week. Canonized 1494, declared Doctor of the Church 1720. The monk-philosopher who made rational theology systematic, rigorous, and devotional simultaneously.

Death Circumstances

Died at Canterbury Cathedral on April 21, 1109 (Wednesday of Holy Week), age 76; peaceful death surrounded by monks; had been ill but mentally sharp; buried in Canterbury Cathedral

Last Words

Not reliably recorded, but sources say he died peacefully reciting prayers

Anselm was born in 1033 in Aosta, Alpine town in Kingdom of Burgundy (modern Valle d’Aosta, Italy), strategically located on mountain passes between Italy and France. His father Gundulf was Lombard nobleman of considerable property. His mother Ermenberga was devoutly religious, instilling deep piety in young Anselm.

As child, he was precociously religious, imagining God dwelling on mountaintops, dreaming of visiting God’s palace in clouds. At age fifteen, he desired entering monastery but was refused (possibly too young, possibly father opposed). The rejection devastated him. He turned to worldly pursuits, becoming what he later called “frivolous” — enjoying aristocratic life, rebelling against religious discipline.

His mother died when he was in early twenties. Relations with domineering father deteriorated. Around 1056, age 23, Anselm fled home, crossing Alps into Burgundy and France with single servant, living wandering scholar’s life for three years.

In 1059, age 26, he arrived at Bec Abbey in Normandy, recently founded (1034) Benedictine monastery rapidly gaining reputation for learning under Prior Lanfranc. Lanfranc (c.1005-1089) was brilliant Italian theologian who established Bec’s school. Anselm was immediately impressed by Lanfranc’s intellectual rigor and spiritual depth. In 1060, Anselm entered Bec as novice monk.

Under Lanfranc’s mentorship, Anselm flourished intellectually and spiritually. He studied liberal arts (grammar, rhetoric, logic), theology, Scripture, Church Fathers (especially Augustine). When Lanfranc became abbot of new monastery at Caen (1063), Anselm, only 30, succeeded him as prior of Bec — responsible for monastery’s daily administration and school’s direction.

As prior (1063-1078), Anselm transformed Bec into Europe’s leading intellectual center. Students came from across Europe. His teaching combined logical rigor with devotional warmth. He developed close friendships with students and fellow monks, writing numerous affectionate letters expressing deep spiritual bonds.

During this period, he wrote his first philosophical works. Monologion (1076) presented arguments for God’s existence and nature through dialectical reasoning. Proslogion (1077-78) contained his famous ontological argument for God’s existence — attempting to prove God from concept alone.

In 1078, Abbot Herluin died. Monks unanimously elected Anselm abbot. He reluctantly accepted, continuing intellectual work while managing monastery’s temporal affairs. He proved excellent administrator — fair, gentle, spiritually wise — though he preferred contemplation to management.

In 1093, Archbishop Lanfranc of Canterbury died. English King William II (William Rufus) kept archbishopric vacant, appropriating its revenues. When William fell seriously ill (1093), fearing death, he appointed Anselm archbishop to secure divine favor. Anselm, age 60, strongly resisted appointment. He loved Bec’s peaceful monastic life; Canterbury meant political entanglements. But under enormous pressure from king, English bishops, and Pope, he accepted.

His fears proved justified. William II recovered and immediately clashed with Anselm over investiture controversy — whether kings could appoint bishops and receive their homage before Church consecration. Anselm maintained spiritual authority (Pope) should invest bishops; William claimed temporal authority (king) controlled appointments in his realm. This wasn’t merely power struggle but fundamental question: Is Church independent or subordinate to state?

Anselm refused compromising Church’s independence. He attended Council of Bari (1098) and Council of Rome (1099), where Pope Urban II reaffirmed Church’s position. William refused allowing Anselm’s return to England. Anselm spent 1097-1100 in exile, welcomed by Italian monasteries and Pope.

William II died in hunting accident (1100). New king Henry I recalled Anselm (1100). But investiture controversy reignited. Henry I demanded homage from bishops; Anselm refused. He went into exile again (1103-1107), this time to France. Finally, compromise was reached (1107): king renounced investiture with spiritual symbols (ring and staff) but bishops rendered temporal homage for lands. Anselm returned to Canterbury (1107).

During exiles, he continued writing. Cur Deus Homo (Why God Became Man, 1094-98) explained atonement through satisfaction theory. De Concordia (On the Harmony of Foreknowledge, Predestination, and Grace with Free Will, 1108-09) addressed theological problems of freedom and grace.

He died April 21, 1109, age 76, on Wednesday of Holy Week, at Canterbury Cathedral. He was peacefully praying, surrounded by monks. He was buried in Canterbury Cathedral. Popular devotion developed immediately, but formal canonization came late (1494). He was declared Doctor of the Church (1720).

His legacy: pioneering rational theology, ontological argument still debated, satisfaction atonement theory dominating Western Christianity, model of intellectual monk balancing contemplation and administration, and defender of Church’s independence from state power.

When Anselm first conceived the ontological argument at Bec Abbey, he was so excited he couldn't sleep. The idea came during nocturnal prayers: God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived; such a being must exist in reality, not just in mind. He rushed to write it on wax tablets, working feverishly through night. But in morning, he couldn't find tablets. He rewrote argument, only to lose those tablets too. Convinced this was devil's temptation to pride or God testing him, he abandoned the project. But the argument obsessed him. Finally, he wrote it in Proslogion, framing it as prayer: "And so, Lord... give me to understand, as much as you know to be fitting, that you are as we believe and you are that which we believe." He presented philosophical proof as devotional meditation, showing reason serves worship. When monk Gaunilo immediately objected with "Lost Island" counterargument (we can conceive perfect island, doesn't mean it exists), Anselm patiently replied, distinguishing necessary being (God) from contingent beings (islands). This exchange began 900+ years of debate about ontological argument's validity. The sleepless monk's midnight insight became one of philosophy's most famous and controversial arguments.
Anselm wasn't trying to replace faith with reason — his ontological argument was presented as prayer, not secular proof, showing reason illuminates faith. He wasn't rationalist subordinating revelation to reason — he explicitly maintained faith precedes understanding, reason serves devotion. His ontological argument isn't claiming we can imagine God into existence — it's arguing that God's unique nature (necessary being) entails existence, unlike contingent beings. He wasn't naive about argument's difficulty — he anticipated objections, engaged Gaunilo's criticisms, and refined his position. His satisfaction theory wasn't claiming God requires payment like human creditor — it explained how divine justice and mercy harmonize through Christ's voluntary satisfaction. He wasn't merely medieval logician unconcerned with devotion — his philosophical works are written as prayers, combining rigorous argument with spiritual meditation. His conflicts with kings weren't personal ambition — he genuinely defended Church's independence at great personal cost, preferring monastic peace to political power. And his philosophy wasn't isolated from life — his administrative wisdom, pastoral care, and personal holiness demonstrated integration of thought and action.
Epochs
Medieval Scholasticism
Schools
Christian Philosophy Scholasticism
Philosophical Themes
EXISTENCE FAITH GOD ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT PERFECTION PRAYER REASON THEOLOGY
Anselm created rational theology as systematic discipline by insisting faith can be rationally demonstrated without undermining devotion. Against fideism (faith alone, reason irrelevant), he argued reason illuminates what faith already accepts — "faith seeking understanding" (fides quaerens intellectum). Against rationalism that subordinates revelation to reason, he maintained reason serves faith, not replaces it. His ontological argument attempts proving God's existence a priori through pure reason: God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived"; such a being must exist in reality because existence in reality is greater than existence in understanding alone; therefore God necessarily exists. This audacious move — proving God from concept alone, without empirical evidence — created centuries of debate. His satisfaction theory explained atonement rationally: sin offends God's infinite honor requiring infinite satisfaction; humans owe infinite debt but can't pay; God-man Christ provides infinite satisfaction humans owe. This replaced earlier ransom theory (Christ pays devil) with juridical framework. His argument from degrees (beauty, goodness, existence come in degrees, requiring absolute standard) established natural theology methodology. But critics (Gaunilo immediately, Kant centuries later) questioned whether existence is predicate, whether conceiving entails existing, whether ontological argument proves anything beyond definitional trickery.

Quotes

  • "For I do not seek to understand in order to believe, but I believe in order to understand. For I believe this also, that unless I believe, I shall not understand."

    — Proslogion, Chapter 1 — establishing "faith seeking understanding" methodology

  • "And certainly that than which a greater cannot be thought cannot be in the understanding alone. For if it is even in the understanding alone, it can be thought to exist in reality also, which is greater."

    — Proslogion, Chapter 2 — the ontological argument's core reasoning

  • "Nor do I seek to understand so that I may believe, but I believe so that I may understand."

    — Proslogion, Preface — restating faith's priority while defending reason's role

MASTERWORK

Proslogion (Discourse on the Existence of God) (1077-1078)

Brief theological meditation presenting ontological argument, written at Bec Abbey. Originally titled "Faith Seeking Understanding" (Fides Quaerens Intellectum). Twenty-six chapters structured as prayer-meditation. Central argument (Chapters 2-4): God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" (id quo maius cogitari nequit). The fool who denies God (Psalm 14:1) understands this phrase when hearing it. What exists in understanding and reality is greater than what exists in understanding alone. Therefore, "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" must exist in reality, not just understanding, otherwise contradiction arises (we could conceive something greater — namely, same being existing in reality). Further argument: God cannot be conceived not to exist, because necessary existence is greater than contingent existence. Revolutionary for: (a) a priori argument for God (no empirical premises), (b) purely conceptual reasoning about existence, (c) showing God's essence entails existence, (d) written as devotional prayer, not dry logic. Immediately controversial: monk Gaunilo replied with "Lost Island" objection; Anselm responded defending argument's uniqueness to necessary being. Influenced: medieval theology, Descartes (ontological argument in Meditations), Leibniz (modal ontological argument), Hegel (concept and reality unite in God), modern analytic philosophy of religion. Still debated: Kant criticized "existence is not predicate"; contemporary philosophers (Plantinga, Malcolm, Hartshorne) defend modal versions. Essential for philosophy of religion, metaphysics, and history of arguments for God's existence.
WORK

Monologion (Soliloquy) (1076)

Earlier theological work presenting multiple arguments for God's existence and attributes through reason alone without Scripture. Arguments from degrees of perfection (goodness, beauty, existence come in degrees, requiring absolute standard), causation (finite beings require ultimate cause), contingency (everything changeable requires necessary being). Establishes God's simplicity, immutability, eternity, omnipotence, omniscience. More Augustinian in approach than Proslogion. Longer, more systematic, less elegant. Shows Anselm's developing rational theology methodology.
WORK

Cur Deus Homo (Why God Became Man) (1094-1098)

Masterwork on atonement theory written during first exile. Structured as dialogue with monk Boso. Question: Why did God become human? Answer: to satisfy debt of sin. Sin offends God's infinite honor, requiring infinite satisfaction. Humans owe debt but can't pay (finite beings can't satisfy infinite debt). Only God can satisfy infinite debt, but humans owe it. Therefore God-man Christ (fully divine, fully human) provides satisfaction humans owe. Voluntary death of sinless God-man satisfies justice while demonstrating mercy. Replaced earlier ransom theory (Christ pays devil). Became dominant Western atonement theory. Influenced Protestant Reformation (penal substitution develops from satisfaction theory), Catholic theology, and systematic theology generally.
WORK

De Veritate (On Truth) (1080-1086)

Dialogue on truth's nature. Defines truth as "rightness perceptible to the mind alone" — conformity to what ought to be. Discusses truth in statements, thoughts, will, actions, senses. Distinguishes truth of being (things existing as they should) from truth of judgment (statements corresponding to reality). Influenced medieval epistemology and theory of truth.
WORK

De Libertate Arbitrii (On Free Will) (1080-1086)

Dialogue on freedom and moral responsibility. Defines freedom not as ability to sin (fallen human condition) but as ability to preserve rightness of will for its own sake. Angels and God have freedom without ability to sin. Humans' ability to sin shows freedom's corruption, not its essence. Influenced medieval debates about freedom, grace, and sin.
Start with Proslogion Chapters 1-4 (ontological argument) — brief, accessible, famous. Thomas Williams's translation (with Gaunilo's reply and Anselm's response) provides helpful introduction. Then read Cur Deus Homo Book I — clear, logical, addressing question everyone asks (why incarnation?). For overview, consult Jasper Hopkins's A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm and Sandra Visser/Thomas Williams's Anselm. For ontological argument specifically, read Alvin Plantinga's God, Freedom, and Evil (modern defense) and Graham Oppy's Ontological Arguments and Belief in God (critique). Brian Davies's and Brian Leftow's Cambridge Companions to Anselm provide excellent scholarly essays. Avoid starting with Monologion — longer, denser, less elegant than Proslogion. Complete works available in Hopkins's translation (four volumes).
Anselm's prayers and meditations: Beyond philosophical treatises, Anselm wrote intensely devotional prayers and meditations — passionate, emotional, mystical. These weren't separate from philosophy but showed his integration of reason and devotion. His prayers addressed Christ, Mary, and saints with remarkable intimacy and emotional intensity, using affective language unusual for medieval male theologian. He emphasized Christ's motherly love, Mary's compassion, and personal relationship with divine. These prayers were extremely popular in Middle Ages, copied widely, read devotionally. They influenced later affective piety (Bernard of Clairvaux, Franciscan spirituality) and medieval mysticism. They show Anselm wasn't cold rationalist but passionate mystic for whom philosophy served worship. His ontological argument's prayerful framing wasn't rhetorical device but genuine devotional context — reason reaching toward God from within faith, not as external proof. Modern philosophical discussions often ignore this context, treating argument as pure logic puzzle. But understanding Anselm requires recognizing he philosophized on his knees, combining intellectual rigor with spiritual passion in unprecedented integration.
RESPONDS TO
  • Augustine (faith seeking understanding, divine illumination, Trinity), Boethius (logic, metaphysics), Aristotle (via Latin translations and commentaries), Platonism (degrees of perfection, participation in absolute), Patristic tradition generally
INFLUENCES
  • Medieval scholasticism (Thomas Aquinas engaged him extensively), Duns Scotus (formal distinction), Descartes (ontological argument in Meditations), Leibniz (modal ontological argument), Spinoza (God's essence includes existence), Hegel (concept-reality unity), Kant (criticized ontological argument), Barth (dialectical theology), analytic philosophy of religion (Plantinga, Malcolm, Hartshorne revived ontological argument)
ARGUED AGAINST
  • Fideism (faith without reason), Islamic philosophy (on Trinity and Incarnation), secular rationalism (reason without faith), worldly power's interference in Church, simony (buying church offices)

Visual Simile

Imagine mathematician proving triangle's angles equal 180 degrees. She doesn't create this truth by proving it; she discovers necessary truth inherent in triangle's nature. Once you understand triangle's definition (three-sided polygon on flat surface), you grasp that angle-sum must equal 180 degrees — not contingent fact but necessary truth following from essence. Similarly, Anselm argues: once you understand God's definition ("that than which nothing greater can be conceived"), you grasp that God must exist in reality — not contingent fact but necessary truth following from essence. Existence isn't added to God externally like paint to canvas. Existence belongs to God's nature like angle-properties belong to triangle's nature. The atheist who understands definition but denies existence is like someone understanding "triangle" but denying three sides — self-contradictory. But critics respond: mathematical truths are definitional, not existential. Proving angle-properties doesn't prove triangles exist in reality, only that IF they exist, they have certain properties. Similarly, ontological argument proves IF God exists, God exists necessarily — not that God exists. That's the debate Anselm sparked.

Anselm pioneered rational theology through “faith seeking understanding” — using reason to illuminate revelation without replacing it.

Faith Seeking Understanding: His method: “I do not seek to understand in order to believe, but I believe in order to understand.” Faith precedes reason temporally and epistemologically. You must believe in God (through revelation, grace, Scripture) before you can understand God rationally. Reason then illuminates what faith accepts, making implicit explicit, confused clear, mysterious intelligible. This isn’t fideism (faith alone, reason irrelevant) or rationalism (reason alone, faith irrelevant) but their integration. Faith provides content; reason provides understanding.

The Ontological Argument: Proslogion Chapter 2 presents famous argument: (1) God is “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” (definition accepted by believer and atheist). (2) Even the fool (Psalm 14:1: “The fool says in his heart there is no God”) understands this definition when hearing it. (3) What exists in understanding and reality is greater than what exists in understanding alone. (4) If God existed only in understanding, we could conceive something greater (same being existing in reality). (5) But this contradicts definition (nothing greater can be conceived). (6) Therefore God must exist in reality. Chapter 3 adds: God cannot even be conceived not to exist (necessary existence is greater than contingent existence).

Gaunilo’s Objection: Monk Gaunilo immediately replied “On Behalf of the Fool”: By same logic, we could prove perfect island exists. We can conceive “island than which no greater island can be conceived.” By ontological argument’s reasoning, such island must exist. But obviously it doesn’t. Therefore argument fails.

Anselm’s Response: Distinguishes necessary being (God) from contingent beings (islands, humans, finite things). Ontological argument applies only to necessary being. Islands are contingent — they could be greater (more trees, beaches, etc.) indefinitely. God is necessary being — perfection without limit. Only for necessary being does essence entail existence.

Historical Reception: Medieval philosophers mostly accepted ontological argument (Bonaventure, Duns Scotus). Thomas Aquinas rejected it, arguing we don’t know God’s essence sufficiently to deduce existence. Descartes revived it (Meditation V). Leibniz refined it modally. Kant famously criticized it, arguing “existence is not real predicate” — existence doesn’t add to concept’s content, so you can’t deduce existence from concept. 20th-century analytic philosophers revived it: Hartshorne, Malcolm, Plantinga developed modal versions arguing necessary existence (existence in all possible worlds) follows from possibly existing necessarily.

Satisfaction Theory of Atonement: Cur Deus Homo asks: Why did God become human? Anselm’s answer through dialogue: Sin offends God’s infinite honor. Infinite offense requires infinite satisfaction. Humans owe this debt (they sinned) but can’t pay it (finite beings can’t satisfy infinite debt). Only God can satisfy infinite debt, but humans owe it. Therefore, only God-man (Christ, fully divine and human) can satisfy what humans owe. Christ’s voluntary death (sinless person dying) provides infinite satisfaction. This satisfies justice (debt paid) while demonstrating mercy (God provides payment). God doesn’t arbitrarily forgive (violating justice) or refuse forgiving (lacking mercy) but harmonizes both through Christ’s satisfaction.

This replaced earlier ransom theory (Christ pays ransom to devil, who held humans captive through sin). Anselm’s juridical framework dominated Western Christianity, influencing Protestantism’s penal substitution theory.

Arguments from Degrees: Monologion presents arguments later called “fourth way” (by Aquinas). Goodness, beauty, existence come in degrees. Things are more or less good, beautiful, existent. Degrees require absolute standard for comparison. Therefore, absolute Good, absolute Beauty, absolute Being (God) must exist as standard. This assumes Platonic participation — finite goods participate in absolute Good. Modern critics question whether degrees require absolute standard or just comparative relations.

Freedom and Necessity: De Libertate Arbitrii defines freedom as “ability to preserve rightness of will for its own sake,” not ability to sin. True freedom is choosing good because it’s right, not because it benefits you. God has maximum freedom while unable to sin. Angels originally had freedom with ability to sin; some chose rightly (preserving freedom without sin-ability), others chose wrongly (losing freedom through sin). Humans inherited corrupted freedom needing grace’s restoration. This compatibilist account tries reconciling divine foreknowledge, predestination, and human freedom through distinguishing freedom’s essence (rectitude-preservation) from its corrupted condition (sin-ability).

Anselm transformed Christian theology and philosophy: (1) Established rational theology as systematic discipline — showing faith can be rationally articulated without undermining devotion. (2) Ontological argument generated 900+ years of debate, influencing Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, and contemporary analytic philosophy of religion. (3) Satisfaction atonement theory became Western Christianity's dominant explanation of Christ's work. (4) Pioneered scholastic method — careful definitions, logical arguments, dialectical dialogue. (5) Influenced medieval philosophy profoundly (Aquinas, Bonaventure, Duns Scotus all engaged him). (6) Provided model of faithful reason — neither fideism nor rationalism but integration. (7) Defended Church's independence from state power through investiture controversy stance. (8) Demonstrated monastic life's compatibility with intellectual rigor. (9) Influenced analytic philosophy's revival of philosophy of religion (Plantinga, Swinburne, van Inwagen). (10) His prayers influenced affective piety and mysticism. Though satisfaction theory is now questioned by many theologians and ontological argument remains controversial, Anselm's vision of faith seeking understanding and his methodological rigor permanently shaped Christian theology and Western philosophy.
Anselm speaks to contemporary philosophy and theology: His ontological argument stimulates modal logic (Plantinga's possible worlds version), philosophy of language (is existence a predicate?), and metaphysics (necessary versus contingent being). His "faith seeking understanding" offers middle path between fideism and evidentialism in religious epistemology. His satisfaction theory relates to debates about justice, forgiveness, and whether God requires payment for sin. His arguments from degrees apply to moral realism (objective values) versus moral relativism. His integration of reason and devotion challenges secular/sacred divide. His political theology (Church independence) relates to contemporary church-state debates. His methodology (careful definition, logical rigor, anticipating objections) exemplifies analytical clarity. His existential concern (ontological argument as prayer, not just logic puzzle) shows philosophy's devotional potential. And his question — does conceiving perfect being entail its existence? — remains live issue in metaphysics and philosophy of religion, generating sophisticated contemporary arguments.
Anselm's ontological argument parallels some Eastern philosophical proofs: Hindu Vedanta argues Brahman's existence is self-evident through experience of consciousness itself — "I am" (aham) reveals absolute Being. Nagarjuna Madhyamaka argues ultimate reality (śūnyatā) cannot be conceived as non-existent without contradiction. Islamic Avicenna developed ontological argument distinguishing necessary being (God) from contingent beings. However, crucial differences: Hindu Brahman is known through mystical experience (anubhava), not conceptual argument. Buddhist śūnyatā is emptiness of inherent existence, not greatest conceivable being. Islamic ontological argument emphasizes necessary being's causal role. Anselm's argument is distinctively conceptual — proving existence from definition alone. Eastern traditions generally emphasize experiential realization over logical proof, mystical vision over dialectical reasoning. Anselm integrates both: ontological argument is prayer-meditation, combining reason and devotion. The parallels show cross-cultural wrestling with how thought relates to ultimate reality, but Western tradition (following Anselm) developed formal logical proofs more systematically than Eastern traditions, which prioritized contemplative realization.
The monk-philosopher who pioneered rational theology — God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived," necessarily existing; faith seeks understanding through reason; sin requires satisfaction through God-man's voluntary atonement.
Accessibility
4/5
Originality
5/5
Influence
5/5
Impact
4/5
Relevance
4/5
4.4/5
Notes
Auto-saving... 0 characters

All Your Notes

Philosophy Chain
↺ Recently Visited
No recent visits
Classical 1
Classical Foundations (200 BCE-400 CE) 3
Classical Indian Philosophy 2
East Asian Buddhist Thought 1
Marxism & Social Critique 1
Medieval Hindu Renaissance 2
Neo-Confucian Revival 1
Postmodernism & Postcolonial Thought 2
Utilitarianism & Social Reform 2
Vedic & Upanishadic Thought 1