Philo of Alexandria

PHILO OF ALEXANDRIA

c. 20 BCE-50 CE

Moses was the first philosopher — Scripture speaks in allegories that reveal Platonic truths to those who can read them.

Difficulty:
Born: -20 in Alexandria, Egypt
Died: 50 (aged 70)
Nationality: Jewish (Hellenistic Egyptian)

Personal Character

Born into one of Alexandria's wealthiest and most prominent Jewish families — his brother Alexander was alabarch (tax collector), one of the richest men in the Roman world; his nephew Tiberius Julius Alexander would become prefect of Egypt and help install Vespasian as emperor. Philo himself chose the contemplative life: studying, writing, interpreting Scripture through Greek philosophical lenses. Deeply devout — made pilgrimage to the Jerusalem Temple, kept Jewish law — yet saturated in Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. In 40 CE, already elderly, he led a delegation to Emperor Caligula to defend Alexandrian Jews against persecution. The mission nearly failed; Caligula was assassinated before implementing his worst threats. Philo: scholar turned diplomat, mystic turned advocate.

Death Circumstances

Unknown — died sometime after 40 CE, probably in Alexandria; no account of his death survives

Last Words

None recorded

Philo was born around 20 BCE into the Jewish aristocracy of Alexandria, the greatest city of the Hellenistic world. Alexandria’s Jewish community was ancient, influential, and Greek-speaking — the Hebrew Bible had been translated into Greek there (the Septuagint) centuries before Philo’s birth. He grew up bilingual in culture: Jewish by faith and practice, Greek by education and language.

His family was extraordinary. His brother Alexander the Alabarch managed tax collection for the Roman government and was wealthy enough to lend money to the Herodian dynasty. His nephew Marcus married a Herodian princess; another nephew, Tiberius Julius Alexander, apostatized from Judaism to pursue a Roman career, eventually commanding troops at the siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE. Philo could have pursued power and wealth. He chose philosophy.

He received a comprehensive Greek education: Homer, the tragedians, Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, rhetoric, music, mathematics. But his central commitment was to the Torah, which he read in Greek. His life’s work was showing that Moses and Plato taught the same truths — indeed, that Plato had learned from Moses. This wasn’t mere apologetics; Philo believed it. The deepest Greek philosophy, he thought, derived from the deepest Jewish revelation.

His method was allegory. The literal text of Scripture, while valid, concealed philosophical meanings accessible through interpretation. When Genesis describes the creation of Adam, it teaches Platonic psychology: the human being as rational soul embodied in matter. When Scripture speaks of God’s “hand” or “anger,” it accommodates human weakness; God is actually incorporeal, impassible, beyond all description. The Torah is philosophy encoded for those who can read it.

In 38 CE, violent pogroms erupted against Alexandria’s Jews. The Greek population attacked Jewish quarters; the Roman prefect Flaccus permitted the violence. Jews were herded into a ghetto, beaten, killed. When Flaccus fell from favor and was executed, the Jews appealed to the new emperor, Caligula.

Philo, now elderly, led the delegation. They met Caligula in Rome and followed him to Puteoli, seeking an audience. Caligula mocked them: “So you are the god-haters who do not believe me to be a god?” He was installing his statue in the Jerusalem Temple — an act that would have provoked mass revolt. Philo’s mission seemed doomed. Then, in January 41 CE, Caligula was assassinated. The statue was never installed. Philo returned to Alexandria and wrote an account of the embassy.

He died sometime after 40 CE — we don’t know when or how. His writings survived because Christians found them useful: his Logos doctrine, his allegorical method, his synthesis of faith and philosophy. Jewish tradition largely forgot him. The philosopher who tried to bridge two worlds found his home in neither — and his influence everywhere.

During the embassy to Caligula, the emperor asked the Jewish delegates why they refused to eat pork. Before Philo could answer, the Greek opponents burst out laughing. Philo noted drily: "Different nations have different customs; there are things your subjects also avoid." Caligula, momentarily amused, replied: "That's true — some won't eat lamb." The exchange shows Philo's diplomacy: defending Judaism without provoking, finding common ground with tyrants, surviving through wit. He was a philosopher who could negotiate with madmen.
Philo didn't reject literal interpretation — he practiced both literal and allegorical reading, considering both valid. He wasn't a crypto-Christian; he was a practicing Jew who kept the law and honored the Temple. He didn't simply baptize Greek philosophy in Jewish terms; he genuinely believed Moses was the original source of philosophical truth. His Logos is not identical to the Christian Christ, though Christians borrowed his language. And he wasn't obscure in his own time — he was prominent enough to lead a life-or-death embassy to the emperor.
Epochs
Hellenistic Philosophy
Schools
Jewish Philosophy Platonism
Philosophical Themes
ALLEGORY CREATION GOD HELLENISM JUDAISM LOGOS SOUL WISDOM
Broke open both containers he inhabited. He made Judaism philosophical, reading Moses as a Platonist avant la lettre. He made Greek philosophy religious, finding revelation where Greeks found reason. The synthesis was unstable — Jews largely ignored him; Christians adopted him. He created the template for faith seeking understanding that would shape Western thought for millennia.

Quotes

  • "In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God."

    — Philo's teaching on the divine Logos (Word/Reason) — his formulation influenced John's Gospel, which echoes this language

  • "Moses learned from the Chaldeans and Egyptians, but he surpassed all their wisdom, as the sun outshines the stars."

    — On the Life of Moses — Moses as supreme philosopher who transcended all other traditions

  • "The letter is to the soul of Scripture what the body is to a human being — both are necessary, but one is visible, the other hidden and more valuable."

    — On allegory — Scripture has a bodily (literal) and spiritual (allegorical) meaning

MASTERWORK

Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis (Legum Allegoriae)

Three books offering philosophical commentary on Genesis 2-3. Adam becomes the rational mind, Eve sensation, the serpent pleasure. Paradise is wisdom; the rivers are the four virtues. Dense, elaborate, endlessly inventive — the template for allegorical interpretation that would dominate Western biblical reading for a millennium.
WORK

On the Creation of the World (De Opificio Mundi)

Commentary on Genesis 1 — creation through the Logos, the intelligible world as template for the sensible
WORK

On the Life of Moses (De Vita Mosis)

Biography presenting Moses as king, lawgiver, priest, and prophet — the supreme philosopher
WORK

On the Embassy to Gaius (Legatio ad Gaium)

Historical account of the Jewish delegation to Caligula — first-person witness to tyranny and survival
WORK

On the Contemplative Life (De Vita Contemplativa)

Description of the Therapeutae, a Jewish contemplative community in Egypt — philosophy lived in community
Start with On the Creation of the World — it's self-contained, shows his method clearly, and connects Genesis to Greek cosmology. David Winston's translation in the Classics of Western Spirituality series includes good introduction. Then sample the Allegorical Interpretation for his interpretive virtuosity.
RESPONDS TO
  • Plato, Stoics, Aristotle, Moses (as philosopher), earlier Jewish interpretation, Pythagoreans
INFLUENCES
  • Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Ambrose, Augustine, medieval allegorists, Maimonides (indirectly)
ARGUED AGAINST
  • Literal-only interpretation, Greek polytheism, Epicurean materialism, those who abandoned Jewish law

Visual Simile

Imagine Scripture as a palace. Most people see only the façade — beautiful, impressive, but external. They read literally and follow the law. Now imagine entering the palace, passing through room after room, each more beautiful than the last: allegorical meanings, philosophical depths, ethical insights. Finally, you reach the innermost chamber — and find it empty. Not empty of meaning but empty of images: the transcendent God who cannot be pictured. The palace is Scripture; the journey is Philo's method; the empty throne room is apophatic theology. He invites you in.

Philo’s central project is synthesis: showing that Jewish Scripture and Greek philosophy teach the same truths. This required sophisticated hermeneutics. Scripture speaks literally (soma — body) and allegorically (psyche — soul). The literal level is valid for practice: follow the law, honor the Temple, keep the Sabbath. The allegorical level reveals philosophical depths: Platonic metaphysics, Stoic ethics, mystical ascent.

His theology is apophatic. God is absolutely transcendent — beyond being, beyond thought, beyond description. We can say what God is not, never what God is. The names and attributes Scripture assigns to God are accommodations to human weakness. God has no passions (impassibility), no body (incorporeality), no change (immutability). Philo anticipates the entire negative theology tradition.

Between the transcendent God and the material world stands the Logos — Word, Reason, divine intermediary. The Logos is God’s instrument in creation, the pattern of the intelligible world, the immanent rationality pervading nature. It is called “firstborn Son of God,” “image of God,” “second God” (deuteros theos). This language would prove immensely influential for Christian Trinitarian theology, though Philo’s Logos is not a person but a divine power.

Creation happens in two stages. First, God creates the intelligible world — the realm of Forms or Ideas, the Platonic template. Then the Logos shapes matter according to this template, producing the sensible world. The sensible world is good (contra Gnostics), an image of the intelligible, but inferior to its model.

Human beings span both worlds. The rational soul (nous) is akin to the divine, capable of ascending to God through contemplation. The irrational soul is bound to the body, dragged down by passion and sensation. Salvation is the mind’s return to God — achieved through ethics (Stoic self-mastery), through study (allegorical interpretation), and through mystical experience (direct vision of God, which Philo claims to have experienced).

Moses is the supreme philosopher because he achieved complete union with God. On Sinai, he “entered the darkness where God was” — not ignorance but super-knowledge, knowing by unknowing. The Torah he delivered is therefore the highest philosophy, encoded for those who can read it.

This synthesis shaped everything after. Christians found in Philo’s Logos a bridge to their own theology. Church fathers borrowed his allegory wholesale. Medieval Jewish and Islamic philosophers followed his lead in harmonizing revelation and reason. The entire project of “faith seeking understanding” begins here.

Philo's influence on Christianity was immense and largely unacknowledged. Clement of Alexandria and Origen borrowed his allegory, his Logos theology, his transcendent God. Augustine absorbed him through Ambrose. The Gospel of John's prologue ("In the beginning was the Word") echoes Philonic language, though the relationship is debated. Medieval Christian allegory — the four senses of Scripture — systematized his method. When Thomas Aquinas speaks of God's incomprehensibility, when mystics describe knowing by unknowing, when interpreters find layers of meaning in texts, Philo stands behind them. His Jewish influence is more complicated. Rabbinic Judaism developed different interpretive methods; Philo's Greek-saturated allegory seemed alien. But medieval Jewish philosophers like Maimonides faced similar challenges — harmonizing Torah and Aristotle — and reached similar solutions, though they rarely cited Philo directly.
Philo addresses questions that remain urgent. How do traditions modernize without dissolving? He held together observance and philosophy, practice and interpretation. How do texts remain alive across changing contexts? His allegory made ancient words speak to contemporary concerns. How do we speak of transcendence without idolatry? His apophatic theology insists that all language about God is provisional. And the tension he embodies — loyal to particular tradition yet open to universal truth — defines the challenge for every religious intellectual in a pluralistic world.
Buddhist upaya (skillful means) resembles allegorical accommodation: teachings adapted to hearers' capacities, the deeper truth veiled in forms. The Islamic falsafa tradition — al-Farabi, Avicenna, Averroes — faced Philo's exact challenge: reconciling revelation (Quran) and reason (Aristotle). Hindu commentators on Scripture used allegory similarly: the literal level for one audience, the philosophical for another. Even Chinese commentators on classics distinguished layers of meaning. Philo invented nothing unique — the synthesis of revealed text and philosophical reason is a perennial human project — but he was its Western pioneer.
The first philosopher of Scripture. Made Moses a Platonist, made Plato a Mosaic — and gave both traditions tools they still use.
Accessibility
2/5
Originality
4/5
Influence
5/5
Impact
4/5
Relevance
3/5
3.6/5
Notes
Auto-saving... 0 characters

All Your Notes

Philosophy Chain
↺ Recently Visited
No recent visits
Classical 1
Classical Foundations (200 BCE-400 CE) 3
Classical Indian Philosophy 2
East Asian Buddhist Thought 1
Marxism & Social Critique 1
Medieval Hindu Renaissance 2
Neo-Confucian Revival 1
Postmodernism & Postcolonial Thought 2
Utilitarianism & Social Reform 2
Vedic & Upanishadic Thought 1